Sometimes, unit tests are really small – so small that they fit on a single line:
Today’s random F# code: one-line unit tests
T
Myths about F#: F#’s strict ordering is dumb! No, it’s great for taming dependencies.
M
In F#, you specify the order of files explicitly. Any code can only reference types, modules and functions that are higher up in the same file or in a file higher up in the file list. When starting with F#, this feels strange because most programming languages don’t rely on ordered files. Some call this feature even dumb.
Myths about F#: F# is slow! No, F# can be really fast.
M
A recurring claim is that OOP languages, in general, are faster than FP languages – or specific to .Net, C# is faster than F#. So today, we take a look at the myth about F# being slow.
Today’s random F# code: Using measures to give types more meaning
T
We use NodaTime in our application to deal with time. As you may remember, time is very important in our application – it’s a attendance time-tracking tool with duty planning and many more features. For example, we use Instant to model a point in time. But sometimes, we need a point in time with a granularity of minutes, not nanoseconds. Instead of introducing our own type to model an instant with minute granularity, we use an Instant with a measure. Let’s see how this works:
Myths about F#: F# is hard to learn! No, it’s just different than C#.
M
A typical conversion: Me: “Did you take a look at F#?”Paul*: “No, it’s just too hard to learn!”Me: “Why?”Paul: “I don’t understand anything because of the syntax.” *Paul = Person assuming unyielding learning F# isn’t hard to learn. But you probably have to learn four concepts that you may never have seen before** **unless you have experience in other functional programming languages Let’s see these concepts and how you can...
Object-Oriented vs. Functional Programming with C# and F# [Presentation]
O
I was invited by JetBrains to talk about OOP and FP and how C# and F# support these paradigms.
Here, you can find the Recording.
And here are the slides.
Happy combining of OOP and FP in your code!
Myths about F#: We can’t use F# because we can’t rewrite everything from C#! You don’t have to, use Interop.
M
Most code running on .Net is written in C#. So when you consider writing some code in F#, you probably already have a good amount of C# code. C# code you want to keep. It probably doesn’t make economic sense to port C# code to F#.
The good news is that you can start using F# anyway. F# and C# have excellent interoperability.
Today’s random F# code: Using Verify to prevent breaking changes in stored data
T
We use event sourcing in many sub-systems of our application to store data. We serialize the data of the events as JSON and store the JSON in the database. To ensure that we don’t change the structure of these event data and by this introduce backward compatibility issues, we use Verify to snapshot test the event data.
Today’s random F# code: Code Structure
T
A frequent question I get is how to structure a codebase in F#. There is not much about this topic out there on the Internet. So here is how we structure our code:
Myths about F#: We tried FP in C#, and it’s unreadable! Yes, but that’s where F# shines.
M
Just today, I read on a social media platform that the author doesn’t like that most programming languages incorporate more and more functional features. The post was accompanied by a short example of pattern matching in C# using some of the features introduced in the latest updates. More generally, I hear and read repeatedly from people that tried to write code in a more functional programming style in C# but weren’t happy with the resulting code. The code was just too hard to read...