Target audience: developers
Urs’ comment: A short, simple book about what makes software complex, how to prevent that and therefore keep software simple. This book contains rules and facts about software regarding code simplicity. The problem of the book is that either you probably know most of its content or you think that it doesn’t work anyway (I got this impression while reading through the reviews on Amazon). Anyway, I think it is worth the time and helps to reflect on one’s own way of coding.
Target audience: .NET developers
Urs’ comment: This book explains Dependency Inject very well: from concepts over patterns and anti-pattern to specific libraries. Read it when you use any kind of Dependency Injection in your .NET project.
The only sad thing is that Ninject is not part of the book
Target audience: software architects
Urs’ comment: This book claims a lot, and delivers little. There are several good tips in this book, but overall I simply don’t like it. I don’t like the “tone” it is written in.
There are only few books about Agile and Lean software architecture, therefore I cannot really give a better alternative covering the same topic.
Ultimately, that means you have to read it in case you are in any kind responsible for the architecture in an Lean/Agile set-up.
Target audience: anybody interested in lean
Urs’ comment: I heard and read a lot about lean during the last years. I heard about eliminating waste, Toyota, lean architecture and much more. This book helped me understand what lean actually is, and what it’s not. I like the samples and stories and the clear distinction of values, principles, methods, tools and activities.
It’s a quick and nice read, so there is no excuse to not read it – in case you want to use the term lean yourself.
For a little more than seven years bbv Software Services AG has been my first employer after my studies at the University of Applied Sciences in Horw, Lucerne. Today it’s time to say goodbye. But before I talk about my new future allow me to take a step back and reflect on my bbv Software Services experience. Continue reading
This Christmas I upgraded my IT infrastructure to the latest and greatest. I bought a new Mac Book Pro Retina 15 inch with 1 TB SDD, 16 GB Ram, NVidia graphics card and latest i7 processor available for Mac Books. This is the detailed spec I currently own:
- 1TB PCIe-based Flash Storage
- 16GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
- 8GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 4.0GHz
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB of GDDR5 memory
The performance and hardware you get for the price is really awesome. Then I started looking around for good external screens for both reading online content and developing software. My thought was to go for 4k screens. Before started evaluating the screens I looked for specs whether the Mac Book could handle 4k resolution and also multiple screens. My quick research showed that connecting 4k screens is possible although I overlooked one small but important detail which I’ll explain later. First I ordered two Samsung LU28D590DS screens. But a good friend of mine told me that the stand of these screens is so terrible that the screen trembles heavily even when you type. So I cancelled my order. After comparing the prices of the remaining 4k screens I finally settled on the Asus PB287Q. It is “only” a TN-Panel but has a very good price for its capabilities.
When I got the screens I started MacOS and connected both 4k screens over mini DisplayPort (on the thunderbolt connector) to my Mac Book. Before I did that I enabled DisplayPort 1.2 support which is required to support 4k with 60Hz. Then the shock started. Only one screen was working at a time. First I thought there is something wrong with the screens. I switched them off and on, exchanged cables and more. Still only one worked at a time. So I googled again the specs and found the missing piece in the puzzle in a support article. Basically they are saying in order to have 4k with 60Hz you need Multi Stream Support enable on the screen which I did and then only one 4 k screen is supported with 60Hz.
See more on Know Your Meme
Let me think again. I have Thunderbolt2 with approximately 20 Gbps bandwidth. DisplayPort 1.2 needs somewhere around 17 Gbps so this should technically be plenty. I have two Thunderbolt2 ports in my Mac Book and still Mac OS refuses to turn on my additional 4k screen. I couldn’t believe that. After some more research and reading the discussion threads here and here I found out that it is really a driver and not a hardware restriction.
So how can I get around this driver restriction? Nothing simpler than that. You prepare a bootcamp partition, install Windows 8.1, start into the Windows 8.1 on the bootcamp partition, connect both 4k screen to each Thunderbolt2 port, Windows 8.1 detects those display and runs them with 60Hz in full 4k resolution! Here the proof:
Dear Apple: Are you silently saying that MacOs is dead and Windows 8.1 is the future platform for Mac Books?
Thanks to Matt Ellis and some bug hunting of me I can proudly say that we have released Resharper 9 integration for Machine.Specifications. You can now install the plugin by using the provided extension manager in Resharper 9.
For those who are using Resharper versions older than 9 I pushed an update for the plugin for Resharper 8.2. It resolves an issues when you switch from Debug to Release mode or vice versa while having a unit test session open. If you did, you actually had to restart Visual Studio so that the Resharper plugin picked up the correct output path location of the specs assembly. Older Resharper versions are no longer supported as well as the installation via batch files. If you find anyting feel free to open issues on the github repository.
In my last post I showed you the TransactionScope class and how you can write your own enlistments to participate in transactions. The code we wrote was all synchronous. This time we are going deep into the abyss and change our code sample to a completely asynchronous API. Let’s explore how the code could look like: Continue reading
I’ll be speaking about Agile Architecture – is it possible? at the BASTA! in Darmstadt next February (The presentation will be in German).
Link to conference.
Link to my session.
In my last installment I gave a brief overview over Service Bus for Windows Server. In this post I’m going to look at High Availability and why it is important. In my last project my job was to help a team out building a robust and reliable infrastructure which leverages Service Bus for Windows Server. On the first day we sat together and discussed the various questions the team had regarding reliability and availability. The first question started like that: “What can we do in code when the Service Bus for Windows Server is not available?” My answer was the following: “In code? Besides trying to reconnect to the Service Bus a configurable amount of time you cannot really do much. If your most important communication layer is down for a longer period of time your system should detect that problem and gracefully shut down its services. If you are not specifically building for an occasionally connected system your infrastructure needs to be made reliable and available. Trying to solve those concerns in your systems code is a waste of time and money.” We shaked hands, the customer said thank you and I went home. Problem solved without writing a single line of code Just joking!
“Use Messaging to transfer packets of data frequently, immediately, reliably, and asynchronously, using customizable formats. [..]” This quote from the Enterprise Integration Patterns book from Gregor Hohpe and Bobby Woolf shows that one of the fundamental principle of messaging is that the messages need to be transferred immediately and reliable. In order to achieve this our Service Bus infrastructure needs to be reliable and highly available. Because Service Bus for Windows Server is a broker-based transport the producers and consumers rely on the availability of a centralized infrastructure. But what could possibly go wrong? Continue reading